The U.S. Navy: conveniently ignorant or insensitive bullies? - Instablogs
The U.S. Navy: conveniently ignorant or insensitive bullies?
Zach P , Okayama: Jul 29 2008
Made Popular Jul 29 2008
Japan :

What if, some entrepreneurial young business major at Virginia Tech, with a heart full of good intention, but a head full of air, acted on that good intention and opened a small arms gun shop on Kent Street? You know, the same Kent Street that lies directly across from Norris Hall where 33 students were gunned down back in April of 2007?
“In the name of self-defense! Our campus must be protected!” hollering indignantly, as he is quickly dragged off to his own public stoning.
Yes, at best, regardless of intention, an individual of such caliber would be, and should be publicly ostracized for his insensitivity, before being indicted and entirely removed from the position in question.

The U.S. Navy: conveniently ignorant or insensitive bullies?So how is it then, that the nuclear-powered ships of the United States Navy would be allowed temporary berth (to resupply and rest their crews) in the Nagasaki prefecture port town of Sasebo? Much to the discontent of local labor organizations, the USS Reagan recently did just that–its second visit to Sasebo in two years. Granted, just like the well-meaning gun shop owner, even though the Reagan was not directly involved in the bombing that left 75,000 citizens of nearby Nagasaki City dead in its nuclear wake, the nuclear class supercarrier is still a harsh reminder of sorts. A grim representative of the atomic age, as staunchly opposed by those who still remember what happened on August 9th, 1945.

So it begs the question, is it really in the name of defense? Are these Sasebo pit stops one of absolute necessity for the unsurprisingly goal-oriented U.S. Navy (Sasebo is, after all, home to U.S. Fleet Activities Sasebo–a naval facility which supports forward-deployed units and visiting operating forces in the Pacific) fleet? Or are they simply continuing the traditions of a drawn-out show of force– a bully’s reminder that the U.S. presence in the Pacific is a permanent, and a necessary measure against the times?

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
You are absolutely right. The U.S. Navy has one objective: intimidation. The same thing is happening is South America (curiously after Brazil discovered 90 billion barrels of oil).
1 Stars
*oil reserves
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
The Philippines was a major port of call of the Pacific fleet for many years (Subic Naval Base and Clark Air Base) until the Philippine Senate gave them the boot in the early 1990s.

The U.S. Naval Base Subic Bay was a major ship-repair, supply, and rest and recreation facility of the United States Navy in the Philippines (1947-1992). It was the largest U.S. Navy installation in the Pacific and was the largest overseas military installation of the United States Armed Forces after Clark Air Base (also in the Philippines) was closed in 1991.

These bases were instrumental and strategic in the US military campaign during the Vietnam War. They were also a cause of utter concern for safety of the Philippines, as the country was a potential target of US enemies, especially during the Cold War.

When the Philippines booted out these US bases, the Pacific fleet was homeless in the Pacific, save for their Diego Garcia Island base in the Indian Ocean.

When the US Navy left the Philippines, it was a huge relief since their presence gave rise to the proliferation of red light districts, STD, tons of toxic waste, tons of e-waste, etc.

But oh yes, there are some things we should be grateful for: employment and loads of chocolates.
1 Stars
Yeah, it’s a tough trade-off in Japan too. Granted, a troop presence boosts the local economy, but at what cost for the people who already lived there?

I don’t buy it.
Add your Comment